WebAnd the Shermans... well... the best Sherman gun in the American tech tree gets a 76mm which is on par, if not worse than the 88 which is stationed on the Tiger I. This gun already has trouble penetrating a well angled Tiger. The M4A3 has this 76, used to be at 5.3, is now at 5.7, while the Tiger H went from 5.7 to 5.3. WebA Sherman 76 could penetrate a Tiger of Panther from the front at normal battle distances if it used this ammo. Shermans were not given much (it went to tank destroyers mostly) but the Nazis had none by Normandy. …
M4A1 sherman vs StuG III ausf. G - History Stack Exchange
WebAug 11, 2024 · It could penetrate more armour than the infamous and deadly German 8.8cm KwK 36 fitted to the German Tiger or the 7.5cm KwK. The 17-pounder also used … WebFeb 27, 2015 · If a Sherman crew sighted a Tiger, they were trained to radio the position to the artillery and get the hell out of there. Furthermore, with the Tiger being such a rare sight on the battlefield avoiding … phone shops in nuneaton
The Sherman 75mm v Tiger 1 88mm - Tank Roar
WebJun 30, 2016 · It could penetrate nearly 100mm of enemy armour from 500 meters and about 90mm from 1000 meters. This was enough to penetrate the Tiger tank on the rear or side armour from a long distance. When the … WebApr 17, 2024 · It really depends on the circumstances. A Jumbo at the side of a tiger II could easily handle it, but it most likely couldn’t penetrate the front of the tiger II, except for the turret cheeks with the m1 76mm. But a jumbo shouldn’t even be engaging a tiger II, the Americans had M18s and M36s for that. WebOct 31, 2024 · The 75 mm could penetrate the side or rear armour of the Tiger and the Panther. Based upon testing, the 76 mm with HVAP … how do you spell causing